Why we must need MHL Cable

You might wonder why MHL is really needed? We already have too many cable standards and the TV manufacturers’ inability to kill old standards such as SCART, composite, component, s-video and D-SUB (VGA) does not bode well for MHL Hdmi. Do we now need even more cable standards? And when MHL often requires an adaptor why not just use HDMI?
The MHL group hopes to make MHL popular despite its challenges. And MHL do have some advantages such as the small size that makes it a perfect fit for smartphones and tablets. MHL can also be combined with other connector designs, making it flexible and easy to incorporate into one unified connector; for example USB. This is not possible with HDMI.
Yet, MHL has already been the focal point in a controversy regarding Samsung's new Galaxy SIII smartphone. Its predecessor, Galaxy SII, was the first to implement MHL but with Galaxy SIII Samsung changed the connector type used for MHL and made every MHL cable and MHL accessory useless with one magic stroke, leaving users frustrated. The MHL standard’s open design guide lines are both a blessing and a curse as it does not dictate a concrete connector type. Your MHL accessories and cables are therefore not necessarily compliant with all manufacturers’ MHL implementations.
But the biggest question is if MHL has already been obviated by better wireless standards? Many consumers transmit video and audio wirelessly over their home network via DLNA or Apple AirPlay - in most cases with no effect on picture quality. So do we really need a new cable standard? Will MHL succeed?
Tell us about your experiences with MHL. Have you tried it on your smartphone or do you think that wireless solutions are superior?
Other new products in www.wholesalehdmicable.es, please click: HDMI Scart Adapter